Physics Video Lecture
Connecting Students in 221 Countries

Video Lectures

High School/JEE/NEET/IPhO Physics | 17-19 Yrs

Motion in One Dimension
Module - 1 Introduction
Duration: 13.56 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 5.23 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 2.26 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 2.33 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Module - 5 Acceleration
Duration: 10.41 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 3.38 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 3.51 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 4.12 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 11.18 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Module - 10 Solved Example-6
Duration: 3.11 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Module - 11 Solved Example-7
Duration: 4.41 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Module - 12 Solved Example-8
Duration: 2.29 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Module - 13 Solved Example-9
Duration: 2.24 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Module - 14 Free Fall Motion
Duration: 6.03 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 2.25 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 10.24 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 3.38 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 5.01 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 17.11 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 14.05 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 13.43 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 5.25 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
  1.  
  2. Sir why do we add a = 2m/s² when the observer is inside lift and doesn't consider it ?
    2 years ago by Shubham

    Post your answer here

  3.  
  4. Why not calculated time at initial velocity at 5 m/s ?
    4 years ago by

    Post your answer here

  5.  
  6. Sir, can time should be same when we pute u=5 m/s isted of u=0 ?
    4 years ago by

    Post your answer here

  7.  
  8. sir!! why we tahe acceleration only be g while we are talking with net acceleration with respect to ground....
    5 years ago by Shubham Vig

    Post your answer here

  9.  
  10. sir why have you taken relative acceleration positive ?
    6 years ago by Dharamjeet Singh

    Post your answer here

  11.  
  12. quset 3 ques 14 ans should be c
    7 years ago by Silla Priyadarshni

    Post your answer here

  13.  
  14. sir why we are taking velocity with respect to ground as 5 m/s?
    7 years ago by Aakash

    Post your answer here

  15.  
  16. I found out Vel. of bolt wrt lift =4(3)^1/2 m/s. Now I used the formula of relative velocity as  Vel. Of bolt wrt lift + Vel.of lift wrt grd= Vel. Of bolt wrt grdie.  -4(3)^1/2 + 5 = 5+ 4(3)^1/2m/s  using this i got vel. Of bolt wrt grd=5-4(3)^1/2 m/s which is different from the answer 5-10/(3)^1/2 m/s....so where am I wrong and why....plz help
    7 years ago by Chetan Gupta

    Post your answer here

  17.  
  18. why we have taken u negetive??
    9 years ago by sudeep khare

    Post your answer here

  19.  
  20. why did we add the accelerations they are in opposite directions so the net acceleration should be 8....pls help
    9 years ago by nishita

    Post your answer here

  21.  
  22. Sir.. if we take everything with respect to ground bolt's U=+5m/s a=-10 and s=-2........ then we get v=root 65 sir?
    9 years ago by JS.Akshaiy Ramlinkam
    Ans 1 ->
    and how can u take s=-2 wen u've considered lift as reference frame?
    9 years ago by JS.Akshaiy Ramlinkam
    Ans 2 ->
    If you are taking ground as reference frame then you cannot use s=-2 in 3rd eq. because s=-2 when we take lift as reference frame. The person at ground observes a different displacement s of bolt which can be cal. as s=5(1/root3)-1/2*g*1/3 and then you put s in 3rd eq. to get velo. final. But it is very complex procedure so you can use 1st eq. to get direct result...
    9 years ago by sudeep khare

    Post your answer here

  23.  
  24. I have the same doubt as asked by Suhail Hakeem.
    10 years ago by Apurv Upreti
    Ans 1 ->
    g can be considered in all ref frames as body weight acts everywhere due to gravity... but in other reference frames we consider relative acceleration...
    9 years ago by Physics Galaxy

    Post your answer here

  25.  
  26. Sir, why we consider 'g' only in frame of reference of ground?
    10 years ago by Suhail Hakeem
    Ans 1 ->
    g can be considered in all ref frames as body weight acts everywhere due to gravity... but in other reference frames we consider relative acceleration...
    9 years ago by Physics Galaxy

    Post your answer here