Physics Video Lecture
Connecting Students in 221 Countries

Video Lectures

High School/JEE/NEET/IPhO Physics | 17-19 Yrs

Motion in One Dimension
Module - 1 Introduction
Duration: 13.56 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 5.23 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 2.26 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 2.33 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Module - 5 Acceleration
Duration: 10.41 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 3.38 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 3.51 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 4.12 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 11.18 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Module - 10 Solved Example-6
Duration: 3.11 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Module - 11 Solved Example-7
Duration: 4.41 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Module - 12 Solved Example-8
Duration: 2.29 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Module - 13 Solved Example-9
Duration: 2.24 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Module - 14 Free Fall Motion
Duration: 6.03 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 2.25 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 10.24 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 3.38 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 5.01 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 17.11 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 14.05 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 13.43 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
Duration: 5.25 Min
 
Add to my sequences
Bookmark This Video
  1.  
  2. Sir why do we add a = 2m/s² when the observer is inside lift and doesn't consider it ?
    3 years ago by Shubham

    Post your answer here

  3.  
  4. Why not calculated time at initial velocity at 5 m/s ?
    4 years ago by

    Post your answer here

  5.  
  6. Sir, can time should be same when we pute u=5 m/s isted of u=0 ?
    4 years ago by

    Post your answer here

  7.  
  8. sir!! why we tahe acceleration only be g while we are talking with net acceleration with respect to ground....
    5 years ago by Shubham Vig

    Post your answer here

  9.  
  10. sir why have you taken relative acceleration positive ?
    6 years ago by Dharamjeet Singh

    Post your answer here

  11.  
  12. quset 3 ques 14 ans should be c
    7 years ago by Silla Priyadarshni

    Post your answer here

  13.  
  14. sir why we are taking velocity with respect to ground as 5 m/s?
    7 years ago by Aakash

    Post your answer here

  15.  
  16. I found out Vel. of bolt wrt lift =4(3)^1/2 m/s. Now I used the formula of relative velocity as  Vel. Of bolt wrt lift + Vel.of lift wrt grd= Vel. Of bolt wrt grdie.  -4(3)^1/2 + 5 = 5+ 4(3)^1/2m/s  using this i got vel. Of bolt wrt grd=5-4(3)^1/2 m/s which is different from the answer 5-10/(3)^1/2 m/s....so where am I wrong and why....plz help
    8 years ago by Chetan Gupta

    Post your answer here

  17.  
  18. why we have taken u negetive??
    9 years ago by sudeep khare

    Post your answer here

  19.  
  20. why did we add the accelerations they are in opposite directions so the net acceleration should be 8....pls help
    9 years ago by nishita

    Post your answer here

  21.  
  22. Sir.. if we take everything with respect to ground bolt's U=+5m/s a=-10 and s=-2........ then we get v=root 65 sir?
    9 years ago by JS.Akshaiy Ramlinkam
    Ans 1 ->
    and how can u take s=-2 wen u've considered lift as reference frame?
    9 years ago by JS.Akshaiy Ramlinkam
    Ans 2 ->
    If you are taking ground as reference frame then you cannot use s=-2 in 3rd eq. because s=-2 when we take lift as reference frame. The person at ground observes a different displacement s of bolt which can be cal. as s=5(1/root3)-1/2*g*1/3 and then you put s in 3rd eq. to get velo. final. But it is very complex procedure so you can use 1st eq. to get direct result...
    9 years ago by sudeep khare

    Post your answer here

  23.  
  24. I have the same doubt as asked by Suhail Hakeem.
    10 years ago by Apurv Upreti
    Ans 1 ->
    g can be considered in all ref frames as body weight acts everywhere due to gravity... but in other reference frames we consider relative acceleration...
    10 years ago by Physics Galaxy

    Post your answer here

  25.  
  26. Sir, why we consider 'g' only in frame of reference of ground?
    10 years ago by Suhail Hakeem
    Ans 1 ->
    g can be considered in all ref frames as body weight acts everywhere due to gravity... but in other reference frames we consider relative acceleration...
    10 years ago by Physics Galaxy

    Post your answer here